I'm not saying Rush Limbaugh is Hitler, but he does use similar tactics (and other rants and raves about President Obama's Address to Congress)
President Obama delivered his address to Congress a week ago yesterday. How nerve-wracking must it be to be a black man standing up in front of America's elite telling white people:
'They're going to be some changes around here?'
There still has to be butterflies running through his stomach as he gets to the podium. If not his stomach, then at least his family's collective stomach. Obama seemed to struggle a couple of times with his voice early in this speech.
I'm not calling for any response here. I'm just making an observation because it seems the 'first-black-President-effect' has already worn off and almost become trite even though two years ago Time magazine wrote a headline questioning Obama's "black"-ness. President Barack Obama crosses these barriers—that now seem trite—with a commander's stride. He controls the lectern as if it's his natural place in the world. His confidence makes it okay for him to be where confidence alone wouldn't have gotten him fifty years ago. First, let's move beyond President Obama's rhetoric and dwell a bit in audience participation.
Can we please stop all the g*d d*mn clapping already?
It's like America is run by a congress of monkeys smacking their hands and showing their teeth. The incessant applause seems barely above flinging feces on the evolutionary scale. The audience at these gatherings seem only satisfied to wait for their turn to be part of the show. By and large, at this event, Democrats search for every opportunity to stand up and visibly show their support while those pledging allegiance to the Grand Old Party sit on their hands and hope someone notices how dissatisfied they are. The same thing was done with W and Clinton before him: it is not something unique to Obama's Administration.
It was annoying with Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush and it's still annoying now. Stop it! You look like g*dd*mned, slack-jawed idiots clapping every two minutes. NOBODY says anything worthy of applause every two minutes! Applause every two minutes takes away from what's being said. After a while, the applause means nothing. Whatever happened to just clapping when he first takes the lectern and then clapping again when he's finished?
That's one more round of applause than your kids generally deserve performing their annual Christmas play!!!
In his address to Congress, President Obama focused on three key issues: education, health-care and energy. Throughout the speech, he spoke a fine line defining the relationship between rich and poor in America. This is the stuff revolutions are made of and President Obama attacked class struggle in America head on without openly attempting to stir unrest. In this regard, President Obama's address dwells in a long, unspoken condition among the people of the United States of America.
President Obama: "Short term gains were prized over long term prosperity."
That sentence does a lot of work. In this one sentence, President Obama addresses the downfall of the U.S. economy and the citizens of the United States of America. Since when is a home an investment? Isn't a home supposed to provide a sense of security? A home is a place to retire when the chaos of the world gets to be too much. Old sayings sometimes have a habit of breaking away from the cliche:
"A man's home is his castle."
Yes, it's sexist; however, that statement doesn't speak to future returns on an investment. That old saying doesn't require a federally mandated disclaimer. The home should represent more than the largest investment return most Americans will ever make in their lives, because now it's not even that. The home should be a safe haven, but seeking "short term gains" turned the home into something to be 'flipped.' The home became something to drive derivatives that nobody understood until it was too late and then those derivatives became illiquid assets that nobody wanted anything more to do with after the amphetamines wore off.
Does illiquid mean the home is worthless now?
"Long term prosperity" suggests the home is a place where you can retire if you have no other place to go. With a home, you'll always have someplace to go. Get the bank off your home's title and you've accomplished something of value regardless of market value.
Before proceeding any further with Obama's speech, it's helpful to remember: there're all kinds of ways to talk about America's class struggle.
President Obama conceptualized improving America's class struggle as: investing in areas like energy, health care and education while bringing the deficit down. He also said, "Flow of credit is the life blood of our economy." Credit is this huge double-edged sword, but he's right.
Without credit, poor people have a much harder time getting out of poverty. If gold is the flavor of the year, the people with gold hoard it so there isn't much to spread around to everyone else. Credit doesn't work that way!
Credit is a balance sheet and most balance sheets seem to have the capacity to go on forever (although Excel will actually stop you at 67,000 rows.) The primary problem with credit being spread around is someone will eventually want to see the final tally sheet. Then they want to compare that tally sheet to real stuff in the world.
The double edge of credit is that it exposes money as make believe.
Confidence gets shaken in credit markets because the credit, in and of itself, means virtually nothing. Which then begins to raise questions about money: is it really just an arbitrary sign of value?
President Obama: "We cannot afford to govern out of anger."
We live in an age of nationalization (which is just a code-word for socialism,) President Obama lists some of America's past socialist programs we now take for granted but about which we still feel good. He listed at least three: the G.I. Bill, Public Education and the federally-funded interstate highway system.
President Obama: "We must be that nation again."
Obama peppered his speech with challenges like JFK's famous challenge to reach the moon. Will seeking a cure for cancer be for Obama the same as JFK's call to reach the moon?
President Obama also uses the word "reform" repeatedly. It is quickly becoming the metaphor of the year. There has to be a better word than "reform," but this is one of those dicey areas. Reform suggests a restructuring of what currently exists. Doesn't some of what currently exists just need to be done away with though?
Governor Mike Huckabee talked about getting rid of the IRS in the Republican primary debates in 2007.
Congressman Ron Paul talked about abolishing the U.S. Federal Reserve as well as the Security & Exchange Commission.
How do you talk about dismantling established parts of the federal government without sounding radical or revolutionary? It is a difficult task.
A topic for another time, because President Obama, during his address to Congress, really distinguished himself from the last 8 years of W's speeches. President Obama asked for Americans to make commitments to be better parents and better people. By linking national prosperity to individual education, Barack Obama created an achievable goal for the nation to strive together and still individually the way most of us like.
Achievable goals are a centerpiece of corporate business leadership training.
Obama asked Americans to commit to making their own worlds better through higher education while W asked Americans to: shop, buy homes and 'oh yeah...heh, heh...911!'
President Obama called out Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and Massachusetts Democrat Senator Edward Kennedy regarding healthcare reform. Not only did Obama call for a bipartisan contribution but he specifically called out men who successfully sponsored legislation together in the past (Orrin Hatch has worked with Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd and Joe Biden on passing legislation in years gone by.)
Combining this bipartisan request with Obama's stated desire to speak out on 'American issues,' it appears President Obama is attempting to get past the 'Party of No' attitude overcoming Republican Congress-members. Regardless of reason, Republicans seem to have decided nothing will work as long as a Democrat proposes the legislation.
If a Democrat proposes legislation already proposed by a Republican we're "on the road to Socialism."
P.S. Glenn Beck is an unthinking, sensationalizing, media-whore idiot! He started with as needed public discussion and turned it quickly for his own needs; but, props to him for suggesting the serious discussion, in English, on American airwaves.
(Approx. 37:00 minute mark) There's a kind of outburst among congress members that's just plain scary! It sounds maniacal and something that could be pressed to war and massacre. It can't be good when groups of humans sound like that!
President Obama says he will go through the budget—line by line—and he claims he can half the deficit by 2013. I imagine he is probably right. Clinton did it. To reduce the deficit, President Obama identified: Iraq "no-bid contracts;" big agribusiness credits; Cold War weapons; "waste, fraud and abuse" in Medicare; tax breaks to corporations "shipping jobs overseas;" and tax breaks for the wealthiest 2 percent of America as areas of opportunity to make our federal budget work better.
It's hard to mount a serious argument against reducing spending on any of those things.
Where we spend our money in the federal government determines what kinds of things happen around us. What we don't spend our money on says more about us than where we do spend money.
(40:00 minute mark) Watch the people in the audience that don't applaud. Group pressure, at this point, is making it harder for them to clap even if they liked something Obama said this late in the speech. These people clapped incessantly for W so they can't argue they're just not the clapping-kind.
More than likely, the people not applauding at the 40 minute mark make more than $250K a year. There's money to be made and war is incredibly expensive. War is inexcusably intrusive, but it's still incredibly expensive.
Kudos to Obama for expressing an 'end of war' message; however, backing up the end of war statement by saying we're not going to allow things to happen in the world makes for a confusing concept of peace (i.e. the end of war.) How do you not allow things to happen in the world? Take a four-year old, even. If you try to not allow a four-year old to do something- you've got a struggle on your hands. Not allowing "things" to happen is ambiguous and potential scary if there is something behind that.
And if there is something behind that, it will be said again!
President Obama: "A new Era of Engagement..."
The world's economy is entangled. We are in fact globalized. The crash of foreign markets along with U.S markets demonstrates on balance sheets an aspect of what globalization means. It seems like Obama seeks to offer inspiration when he says 'we can shape our world;' however, it is responsible to be cautious here. Such statements are a little scary. There should be questions asked at this point, like: When we start reshaping the world who created the design?
Inspiration is wonderful.
A healthy dose of cautious hesitation isn't such a bad thing.
President Obama distinguished himself from W with his choice of anecdotes to wind down his speech. Comparing Obama anecdotes to W's might make an interesting study. W'd tell you about some good ole boy or girl who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and are 'making it happen.' Obama, on the other hand, pulls out Leonard Abbis (sp) a bank president who gave a $60-million bonus away to employees and former employees.
I like Obama's story better than W's!
SPEECH ALERT-
(50:00 minute mark) Changing the world has become a recurring theme in this speech.
He's speaking to a ritual we all went through in school in the United States of America.
We've all (i.e. American citizens brought up in public school) been indoctrinated with a fondness for the United States of America. We all have something deep down that is almost romantic about our fondness for this country. We've all (probably) held our hand over our heart at least once while facing a flag. It's deep down for some people and others wear it on their sleeves, but Americans (generally speaking) dig the country (if not the actual people in it.)
Republican Governor Bobby Jindal gave the Republican response to Obama's address, apparently, in the form of '70's public school documentary.' Essentially, Jindal's response can be characterized as a folksy anecdote ending with the moral that raising taxes is bad and pretty much every problem Obama has placed on the agenda is important but sure to be handled improperly by Obama and the Democrats.
The funny thing is some Republicans are seriously suggesting Rush Limbaugh is the new leader of the Republican party. Rush is not a shy guy. He took it upon himself recently to define conservatives at a Conservative Political Action Committee gathering.
In the first ten minutes of his speech, Rush uses religion as a set up for a lame joke. Then he pulls out the tired-isms from yester-year (i.e. people can be "the best he or she wants to be...We want every American to be the best he or she chooses to be.") Rush wants you to believe that everyone who failed made the wrong choices.
It's much easier to ignore poverty in the world if you think all poor people are wrong.
That was smart!
I'm not saying Rush Limbaugh is Hitler, but he does use similar tactics!



Comments